Texas Tech
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
359  Nokuthula Dlamini JR 20:37
871  Hattie Schunk JR 21:19
1,080  Jasmine Torres SR 21:33
1,095  Taryn Otto FR 21:34
1,386  Denae Chapman SO 21:53
1,420  Kaylee Amershek JR 21:55
1,584  Lauren Offerman FR 22:04
1,636  Lauren Younger JR 22:08
1,658  Bret Leigh Nance SO 22:10
1,836  Kaitlyn Tharp JR 22:22
National Rank #142 of 348
Mountain Region Rank #18 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nokuthula Dlamini Hattie Schunk Jasmine Torres Taryn Otto Denae Chapman Kaylee Amershek Lauren Offerman Lauren Younger Bret Leigh Nance Kaitlyn Tharp
Texas Invitational 09/14 1124 20:30 21:35 21:44 21:49 22:13 21:40 22:03 21:25
Chile Pepper Festival 09/29 1211 21:03 21:46 21:41 22:13 21:57 22:05 22:08 22:37 22:12
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 1053 20:07 21:09 21:40 21:35 21:47 22:15 22:08 21:57
Big 12 Championship 10/28 1094 20:29 21:23 21:07 21:30 21:53 21:40 21:52 22:12 22:17 22:30
Mountain Region Championships 11/10 1185 21:02 21:28 22:02 21:22 21:53 21:37 22:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.7 474 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.2 2.6 3.3 7.8 15.2 27.9 39.8 0.8



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nokuthula Dlamini 0.6% 173.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nokuthula Dlamini 50.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4
Hattie Schunk 95.4
Jasmine Torres 107.0
Taryn Otto 108.1
Denae Chapman 120.2
Kaylee Amershek 121.3
Lauren Offerman 125.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.6% 0.6 11
12 1.0% 1.0 12
13 1.2% 1.2 13
14 2.6% 2.6 14
15 3.3% 3.3 15
16 7.8% 7.8 16
17 15.2% 15.2 17
18 27.9% 27.9 18
19 39.8% 39.8 19
20 0.8% 0.8 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0